When you're building real-time analytics into your application, the database choice often comes down to two contenders: ClickHouse for its raw analytical speed, or TimescaleDB for its PostgreSQL compatibility and time-series optimizations. Both databases handle high-volume data ingestion and complex queries, but they take fundamentally different approaches to storage, scaling, and developer experience.
This comparison examines how ClickHouse and TimescaleDB differ in architecture, query performance, operational complexity, and total cost of ownership. You'll learn when each database fits your use case, how they handle real-world analytics workloads, and whether managed services like Tinybird or Timescale Cloud make sense for your team.
Key takeaways at a glance
ClickHouse is a column-oriented database built for large-scale analytical queries, delivering fast aggregations and efficient storage compression. TimescaleDB extends PostgreSQL with time-series optimizations like automatic partitioning and continuous aggregates, combining SQL familiarity with time-series performance. Choose ClickHouse when you're working with denormalized schemas and need maximum speed for analytical queries across billions of rows. Pick TimescaleDB when you want to combine relational tables with time-series data using standard SQL joins, or when your team already knows PostgreSQL.
Architecture and storage model differences
ClickHouse and TimescaleDB take opposite approaches to storing data. ClickHouse stores each column separately on disk, while TimescaleDB stores complete rows together, building on PostgreSQL's row-based design.
Columnar engine in ClickHouse
ClickHouse saves each column in its own file on disk. When you run SELECT avg(price) FROM sales, ClickHouse reads just the price column instead of loading every column in every row. This makes aggregations fast because the database skips data it doesn't need.
Storing similar values together also improves compression. Numbers in a price column compress better when grouped than when mixed with user IDs and timestamps. Compression ratios often reach 10x to 100x, depending on the data.
ClickHouse processes columns in batches using vectorized execution, which takes advantage of modern CPU instructions. A query that sums millions of values can run in milliseconds because the CPU processes multiple values at once.
Chunked row store in TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB stores all column values for a single row together, following PostgreSQL's row-based model. A table called a hypertable automatically splits into chunks based on time intervals. When you query data from last week, TimescaleDB scans only the chunks covering that week.
This design keeps PostgreSQL's features like foreign keys, triggers, and complex joins while adding time-series performance improvements. You get the full PostgreSQL ecosystem without giving up compatibility.
Ingestion throughput and latency
The speed at which each database accepts new data depends on batch size and consistency requirements.
Batch inserts
ClickHouse handles large batches efficiently, often processing 4 million rows per second when batches exceed 10,000 rows. The columnar format and lack of row-level locking allow fast writes. Small batches under 1,000 rows create overhead because each insert triggers internal operations.
TimescaleDB performs better with smaller batches due to PostgreSQL's transactional architecture. Benchmarks show TimescaleDB outperforming ClickHouse for batches under 1,000 rows. The tradeoff is lower peak throughput, typically tens of thousands of rows per second rather than millions.
Streaming connectors and change data capture
Both databases support real-time ingestion through various connectors. ClickHouse offers native Kafka integration and HTTP streaming endpoints. TimescaleDB works with PostgreSQL-compatible tools like Debezium for change data capture.
Tinybird provides managed streaming ingestion for ClickHouse through its Events API and connectors, handling backpressure and schema validation automatically. This removes the work of building custom ingestion pipelines.
Query performance on real-time analytics workloads
RTABench, a benchmark designed for real-time analytics patterns, shows TimescaleDB running 1.9x faster than ClickHouse despite being 6.8x slower on ClickBench, which tests large-scale aggregations. The difference comes from how each database handles different query patterns.
Point lookups
TimescaleDB's row-based storage and B-tree indexes make it faster for queries that fetch specific rows. Looking up a single user's session or finding an order by ID typically returns results in single-digit milliseconds.
ClickHouse's columnar format means point lookups scan more data structures, though sparse primary indexes help. Applications that mix analytical queries with frequent point lookups often see more consistent latency with TimescaleDB.
Large-window aggregations
ClickHouse dominates queries that aggregate across large time windows or high-cardinality dimensions. Calculating daily averages across millions of events or summing revenue by product category across billions of rows plays to ClickHouse's strengths.
A query like SELECT date, sum(revenue) FROM sales GROUP BY date runs orders of magnitude faster in ClickHouse when working with hundreds of millions of rows. The columnar format reads only the date and revenue columns, and vectorized execution processes aggregations at CPU cache speeds.
Join and denormalization strategies
TimescaleDB handles normalized schemas with multiple joined tables more naturally. You can maintain separate tables for users, products, and orders, then join them in queries without major performance penalties for moderately sized datasets.
ClickHouse performs best with denormalized data where related information lives in the same table. Pre-joining tables and storing redundant data reduces query complexity and improves performance. The tradeoff is increased storage space and more complex pipelines to maintain denormalized tables.
Developer experience and tooling
The learning curve and development workflow differ between these databases.
Schema evolution workflow
TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL's ALTER TABLE capabilities, making schema changes straightforward. Adding a column, changing a data type, or creating an index uses familiar SQL commands. You can test migrations locally and apply them to production with confidence.
ClickHouse schema migrations require more care. While you can add columns with ALTER TABLE, changing column types or reordering columns often means creating a new table and copying data. Recent versions have improved this, but the lack of transactional DDL means you can't roll back schema changes atomically.
Building production APIs with Tinybird pipes
Tinybird simplifies ClickHouse development by providing a declarative syntax for defining data pipelines and API endpoints. Instead of managing SQL queries in application code, you define pipes that transform data and expose results as REST APIs.
Here's a basic pipe that aggregates user activity:
TOKEN activity\_api\_read READ
NODE aggregate\_activity
SQL >
%
SELECT
toStartOfHour(timestamp) AS hour,
user\_id,
count() AS event\_count
FROM user\_events
WHERE timestamp >= {{DateTime(start\_date, '2024-01-01 00:00:00')}}
GROUP BY hour, user\_id
ORDER BY hour DESC
TYPE endpoint
Deploy with tb --cloud deploy and Tinybird generates a parameterized API endpoint automatically. The platform handles query optimization, caching, and scaling without additional configuration.
Storage footprint and compression efficiency
Storage costs matter when time-series data accumulates continuously.
Default compression algorithms
ClickHouse uses LZ4 compression by default, balancing compression ratio with decompression speed. You can switch to ZSTD for higher compression when storage costs outweigh query performance. Typical compression ratios range from 10x to 100x depending on data characteristics.
TimescaleDB relies on PostgreSQL's TOAST compression, which is less aggressive than ClickHouse's columnar compression. Typical compression ratios fall between 2x and 10x. TimescaleDB's compression feature for hypertables can achieve columnar-like compression by converting older chunks into a compressed columnar format.
Partitioning and TTL policies
ClickHouse supports table-level TTL policies that automatically delete or move old data based on time or other criteria. You can specify different TTL rules for different columns, archiving old data to cheaper storage while keeping recent data on fast SSDs.
TimescaleDB offers retention policies that drop entire chunks after a specified period. Combined with continuous aggregates that pre-compute rollups of old data, this approach balances storage costs with query performance for historical analysis.
Scalability and high availability options
As data volumes grow, both databases offer different paths to horizontal scaling.
Sharding and replication in ClickHouse
ClickHouse supports distributed tables that shard data across multiple nodes. You define a sharding key, and ClickHouse routes writes to appropriate shards automatically. Queries against distributed tables aggregate results from all shards transparently.
Setting up ClickHouse clusters requires expertise in distributed systems. You configure replication, monitor shard balance, and handle node failures manually. Tinybird eliminates this complexity by providing managed ClickHouse clusters that scale automatically based on workload, handling sharding, replication, and failover without manual intervention.
TimescaleDB multi-node and Patroni
TimescaleDB offers multi-node deployments for horizontal scaling, though this feature is less mature than ClickHouse's distributed tables. For high availability, TimescaleDB typically relies on PostgreSQL clustering tools like Patroni, which provide automatic failover and replication.
Cloud-managed TimescaleDB services handle most operational complexity, but the underlying PostgreSQL architecture means scaling writes remains more challenging than with ClickHouse.
Time-series functions and analytics features
Both databases provide specialized functions for time-series analysis, though with different approaches.
Materialized views vs continuous aggregates
ClickHouse materialized views automatically maintain pre-aggregated results as new data arrives. When you insert data into a source table, materialized views update incrementally. Queries against aggregated data run very fast because the computation happened at write time.
Window functions and downsampling helpers
TimescaleDB provides the time\_bucket() function, which groups timestamps into fixed intervals like 5-minute or 1-hour buckets. This makes downsampling queries intuitive: SELECT time_bucket('1 hour', timestamp), avg(value) FROM metrics GROUP BY 1.
ClickHouse offers similar functionality through toStartOfInterval() and specialized functions like toStartOfHour(). Both databases support window functions for computing running aggregates, though ClickHouse's implementation is optimized for analytical patterns while TimescaleDB inherits PostgreSQL's more general-purpose window functions.
Total cost of ownership for self-hosted and managed
The true cost of running these databases includes hardware, operational overhead, and engineering time.
Hardware and ops overheads
Self-hosting ClickHouse requires expertise in distributed systems. You configure compression codecs, tune merge tree parameters, monitor memory usage, and manage distributed query execution. For organizations without dedicated database engineers, operational burden often exceeds hardware costs.
TimescaleDB's PostgreSQL foundation means more engineers have relevant experience, reducing the learning curve. Standard PostgreSQL monitoring and backup tools work with TimescaleDB. However, optimizing TimescaleDB for large-scale analytics still requires specialized knowledge.
Managed service pricing tiers
ClickHouse Cloud charges based on compute and storage separately, with pricing that scales with query complexity. Timescale Cloud offers similar pricing models with different rate structures.
Tinybird provides managed ClickHouse with a developer-focused pricing model that includes data ingestion, storage, and API requests in a single plan. The platform eliminates separate charges for ingestion infrastructure and API gateways, simplifying cost prediction. Sign up for a free Tinybird account to explore pricing for your workload.
Migration paths from TimescaleDB to ClickHouse
Organizations often start with TimescaleDB and migrate to ClickHouse as analytical workloads grow. Here's how that migration typically works.
1. Change-data-capture replication
The first step sets up continuous replication from PostgreSQL to ClickHouse using CDC tools. ClickHouse Cloud's ClickPipes feature includes a Postgres CDC connector that handles initial backfill and ongoing synchronization automatically.
This approach lets you run both databases in parallel, sending analytical queries to ClickHouse while keeping transactional workloads in TimescaleDB. You validate query performance and data consistency before committing to a full migration.
2. Dual-write phase
During dual-write, your application writes data to both databases simultaneously. This eliminates replication lag and lets you test ClickHouse query performance with real-time data. Monitor query latency, resource usage, and result accuracy during this phase.
Differences in how each database handles null values, timestamp precision, or floating-point arithmetic can surface here. Testing with production traffic reveals edge cases that might not appear in synthetic benchmarks.
3. Cut-over and validation
The final step redirects all analytical queries to ClickHouse and decommissions the TimescaleDB instance for analytics. Keep TimescaleDB running if it still serves transactional workloads, or migrate those to a separate PostgreSQL instance.
Tinybird's migration support includes schema conversion tools and query translation assistance, helping teams move from TimescaleDB to managed ClickHouse faster. The platform's observability features make it easier to validate that migrated queries produce correct results with acceptable performance.
When to choose each database
The right choice depends on your data model, query patterns, and team expertise.
- For analytical speed on large datasets: Choose ClickHouse when you're working with hundreds of millions or billions of rows and your queries primarily aggregate across large time windows or high-cardinality dimensions. Denormalized schemas work best.
- For relational time-series integration: Choose TimescaleDB when you combine time-series data with traditional relational tables using joins, or when your team's PostgreSQL expertise outweighs the performance benefits of ClickHouse. Normalized schemas and transactional consistency requirements favor TimescaleDB.
- For hybrid approaches: Use both databases for different workloads. Keep recent, frequently updated data in TimescaleDB for operational queries and point lookups. Replicate data to ClickHouse for long-term storage and complex analytical queries.
Tinybird and the fast path to managed ClickHouse
Tinybird provides managed ClickHouse infrastructure designed for developers who want to integrate analytical capabilities into their applications without managing database operations. The platform handles cluster provisioning, scaling, monitoring, and optimization automatically.
Beyond managed infrastructure, Tinybird offers a developer experience focused on speed. Define data pipelines as code using pipes, test locally with tb dev, and deploy to production with tb deploy. The platform generates REST APIs from SQL queries automatically, eliminating the work of building and maintaining separate API layers.
Data ingestion works through the Events API or pre-built connectors for Kafka, S3, and other sources. Tinybird handles schema validation, deduplication, and backpressure without custom code. Create a free Tinybird account to start building with managed ClickHouse.
FAQs about ClickHouse and TimescaleDB
Does ClickHouse support ACID transactions?
ClickHouse provides eventual consistency but not full ACID transactions like traditional relational databases. Inserts become visible to queries after data is written to disk and merged, which typically happens within seconds. The database is designed for analytical workloads where eventual consistency is acceptable, not for transactional systems requiring immediate read-after-write guarantees.
Can TimescaleDB handle high-cardinality joins efficiently?
TimescaleDB can perform joins, but performance degrades with very high cardinality data due to its row-based storage model, with ingestion rates dropping from 557K to 159K rows/s at 10 million hosts. When joining tables with millions of distinct values in join keys, consider denormalization for frequently joined high-cardinality datasets. TimescaleDB works well for moderate-cardinality joins, such as joining user sessions with user profile data.
How do I protect PII data in ClickHouse?
ClickHouse offers role-based access control, row-level security policies, and data masking functions to protect sensitive information. You can define policies that filter rows based on user roles or apply functions that hash or redact PII in query results.
/