Postgres is great as an OLTP database, but if you need real-time queries on hundreds of millions of rows, it's not going to be fast enough. Tinybird is. Most queries from Postgres will look very similar on Tinybird. This guide explains how to adapt most Postgres queries to run on Tinybird.
This post is inspired by Haki Benita's blog post on SQL for data analysis. We'll show you how to adapt most of the Postgres queries from Haki's post to run on Tinybird.
Prerequisites
You don't need an active Tinybird Workspace to read through this post, but it's a good idea to read Haki's post first so you're familiar with the examples. In addition, a working knowledge of Tinybird and SQL is required.
Common table expressions
Both the WITH <expression> AS <identifier> as well as the WITH <identifier> AS <subquery expression> syntaxes are supported.
WITH emails AS (
SELECT 'ME@hakibenita.com' AS email
)
SELECT * FROM emails
;
WITH emails AS
(
SELECT 'ME@hakibenita.com' AS email
)
SELECT *
FROM emails
Query id: 6b234b03-6dc4-4ddf-8454-b03d34b75b60
┌─email─────────────┐
│ ME@hakibenita.com │
└───────────────────┘
1 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.014 sec.
WITH emails AS (
SELECT 'ME@hakibenita.com' AS email
),
normalized_emails AS (
SELECT lower(email) AS email FROM emails
)
SELECT * FROM normalized_emails;
WITH
emails AS
(
SELECT 'ME@hakibenita.com' AS email
),
normalized_emails AS
(
SELECT lower(email) AS email
FROM emails
)
SELECT *
FROM normalized_emails
Query id: c511a113-1852-4a9f-90bf-99d33eba8254
┌─email─────────────┐
│ me@hakibenita.com │
└───────────────────┘
1 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.127 sec.
On Tinybird
For now, Tinybird only supports the WITH <expression> AS <identifier> syntax. The previous queries need to be rewritten like this:
WITH (SELECT 'ME@hakibenita.com') AS email
SELECT email
There's a difference with CTEs on Postgres VS Tinybird. In Postgres, as the original post says, "CTEs are a great way to split a big query into smaller chunks, perform recursive queries and even to cache intermediate results". On Tinybird, CTEs can only return one row, so those intermediate results can't have multiple rows. For a similar result, on Tinybird you have to use subqueries.
A common pattern is returning a tuple of groupArrays in the CTE, so you can return more than one row in the form of arrays. Then consume the results in the main query with transform for instance or arrayJoin.
In Tinybird, Pipes act like notebooks where each node is a subquery and you can refer to the results of one node in another Node. It's great to see intermediate results and reduce the complexity of your queries. If you'd like to try it out, sign up here.
Generating data
As you see in the original article, in Postgres there are several ways to do it:
Union all
This works the same in Tinybird as in Postgres:
WITH dt AS (
SELECT 1 AS id, 'haki' AS name
UNION ALL
SELECT 2, 'benita'
)
SELECT * FROM dt;
WITH dt AS (
SELECT
1 AS id,
'haki' AS name
UNION ALL
SELECT
2,
'benita'
)
SELECT *
FROM dt
Query id: e755e5a5-5e5b-4e8a-a262-935f9946d45d
┌─id─┬─name───┐
│ 2 │ benita │
└────┴────────┘
┌─id─┬─name─┐
│ 1 │ haki │
└────┴──────┘
2 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.051 sec.
The VALUES keyword won't work on Tinybird to select data, only to insert it.
Joining data
The join syntax from Postgres will work on Tinybird, but typically the kinds of analytical data that you'll store on Tinybird will be orders of magnitude bigger than what you'd store on Postgres, and this would make your joins slow. There are ways to make JOINs faster, check the best practices for writing faster SQL queries or contact us for guidance.
Unnest - arrayJoin
arrayJoin is the Tinybird equivalent of unnest on Postgres. So this Postgres query:
WITH dt AS (
SELECT unnest(array[1, 2]) AS n
)
SELECT * FROM dt;
Would be rewritten on Tinybird like this:
SELECT arrayJoin([1, 2]) AS dt
Generating series of data
Generate_series
The generate_series doesn't exist on Tinybird, but with the numbers function a lot can be accomplished. This is its basic usage:
SELECT * FROM numbers(10)
A similar result can be obtained with the range function, that returns arrays. If you only provide an argument, it behaves like numbers. And with range you can also specify a start, end and step:
SELECT range(10), range(0, 10, 2)
This, combined with arrayJoin lets us do the same as generate_series:
SELECT arrayJoin(range(0, 10, 2)) AS number
Generating time series
generate_series can produce results with other types different than integers, while range only outputs integers. But with some smart logic you can achieve the same results. For example, on Postgres you'd generate a with a datetime for each hour in a day this way, as in the original post:
WITH daterange AS (
SELECT *
FROM generate_series(
'2021-01-01 UTC'::timestamptz, -- start
'2021-01-02 UTC'::timestamptz, -- stop
interval '1 hour' -- step
) AS t(hh)
) SELECT * FROM daterange;
hh
────────────────────────
2021-01-01 00:00:00+00
2021-01-01 01:00:00+00
2021-01-01 02:00:00+00
...
2021-01-01 22:00:00+00
2021-01-01 23:00:00+00
2021-01-02 00:00:00+00
Generate a time series specifying the start date and the number of intervals
On Tinybird, you can achieve the same this way:
WITH toDate('2021-01-01') as start
SELECT addHours(toDate(start), number) AS hh
FROM (
SELECT arrayJoin(range(0, 24)) AS number
)
Generate a time series specifying the start and end date and the step
Another way of doing the same thing:
WITH toStartOfDay(toDate('2021-01-01')) AS start,
toStartOfDay(toDate('2021-01-02')) AS end
SELECT arrayJoin(arrayMap(x -> toDateTime(x), range(toUInt32(start), toUInt32(end), 3600))) as hh
Generate a time series using timeSlots
Using the timeSlots function, you can specify the start (DateTime), duration (seconds) and step (seconds) and it generates an array of DateTime values.
WITH toDateTime('2021-01-01 00:00:00') AS start
SELECT arrayJoin(timeSlots(start, toUInt32(24 * 3600), 3600)) AS hh
Generating a random value
The rand function in Tinybird is akin to random in Postgres, with the difference that rand returns a random UInt32 number between 0 and 4294967295. So to get random floats between 0 and 1 like random, you have to divide the result by 4294967295.
SELECT
rand() random_int,
random_int / 4294967295 random_float
To get more than one row, you'd simply do
SELECT
rand() random_int,
random_int / 4294967295 random_float
FROM numbers(100)
Generating random integers within a range
You would use the floor or ceil function (not round, for the reasons explained Haki Benita’s SQL random examples) in addition to the result of rand multiplied by the max of the range of integers you want to generate, like this:
SELECT
ceil(rand() / 4294967295 * 3) AS n
FROM
numbers(10)
And here you can see that the distribution is uniform (this wouldn't happen if you had use round):
SELECT
ceil(rand() / 4294967295 * 3) AS n,
count(*)
FROM
numbers(10000)
GROUP BY n
ORDER BY n
Sampling data from a list
This is how you'd take samples with replacement from a list in Postgres:
SELECT
(array['red', 'green', 'blue'])[ceil(random() * 3)] AS color
FROM
generate_series(1, 5);
In Tinybird, this is how you'd do it:
SELECT
['red', 'green', 'blue'][toInt32(ceil(rand() / 4294967295 * 3))] AS color
FROM
numbers(5)
To get only one value, you'd remove the FROM numbers(5) part. Note that to define an array on Tinybird you can do it either calling array('red', 'green', 'blue') or with ['red', 'green', 'blue'] like in the code snippet.
Sampling data from a table
Sorting data by rand() can be used to get a random sample, like here:
SELECT *
FROM events_mat
ORDER BY rand()
LIMIT 100
But this is slow, as a full scan of the table has to be run here.
A more efficient way to do it's using the SAMPLE clause. You can pass an integer to it (should be large enough, typically above 1000000):
SELECT * FROM events_mat SAMPLE 1000000
And you can also pass a float between 0 and 1, to indicate the fraction of the data that will be sampled.
SELECT * FROM events_mat SAMPLE 0.01
Descriptive statistics on a numeric series
Tinybird also comes with lots of statistical function, like Postgres does (see this section of the original post). The first query, written on Postgres this way:
WITH s AS (
SELECT * FROM (VALUES (1), (2), (3)) AS t(n)
)
SELECT
count(*),
avg(n),
stddev(n),
min(n),
percentile_cont(array[0.25, 0.5, 0.75]) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY n),
max(n)
FROM
s;
count │ avg │ stddev │ min │ percentile_cont │ max
──────┼────────┼───────────┼─────┼─────────────────┼─────
3 │ 2.0000 │ 1.0000000 │ 1 │ {1.5,2,2.5} │ 3
Would be done on Tinybird like this:
SELECT
count(*),
avg(n),
stddevSamp(n),
min(n),
quantiles(0.25, 0.5, 0.75)(n),
max(n)
FROM
(SELECT arrayJoin([1,2,3]) AS n)
Descriptive statistics on categorical series
Tinybird can also be used to get some statistics from discrete values. While on Postgres you'd do this:
WITH s AS (SELECT unnest(array['a', 'a', 'b', 'c']) AS v)
SELECT
count(*),
count(DISTINCT V) AS unique,
mode() WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY V) AS top
FROM
s;
count │ unique │ top
───────┼────────┼─────
4 │ 3 │ a
On Tinybird you'd do:
SELECT
count(*) AS count,
uniq(v) AS unique,
topK(1)(v) top
FROM
(SELECT arrayJoin(['a', 'b', 'c', 'd']) AS v)
uniq will provide approximate results when your data is very big. If you need exact results you can use uniqExact, but be aware that uniq will generally be faster than uniqExact. Check out the topK docs as well if you're interested.
As a side note, if you have categorical columns, most likely you'll have better performance and lower storage cost data types. The performance of using LowCardinality will be better than using the base data types even on columns with more than a few millions of different values.
Subtotals and aggregations
The same operations done in this section of Haki's post can be done with Tinybird.
Given a table that contains this data:
SELECT * FROM employees
Finding the number of employees with each role is straightforward, same syntax as on Postgres:
SELECT department, role, count(*) count
FROM employees
GROUP BY department, role
Using rollup and cube
The ROLLUP modifier is also available on Tinybird, although the syntax is slightly different than on Postgres. This query on Postgres:
SELECT department, role, COUNT(*)
FROM employees
GROUP BY ROLLUP(department, role);
would be written on Tinybird like this:
SELECT department, role, COUNT(*)
FROM employees
GROUP BY department, role WITH ROLLUP
It allows you to have more subtotals (but not all). To have all the subtotals for all the possible combinations of grouping keys, you need to use the CUBE modifier:
SELECT department, role, COUNT(*)
FROM employees
GROUP BY department, role WITH CUBE
Pivot tables and conditional expressions
Pivot tables let you reshape data when you want typically a column with keys, a column with categories and a column with values, and you want to aggregate those values and use the categories column as columns of a new table.
On Postgres you could do it this way:
SELECT
role,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE department = 'R&D') as "R&D",
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE department = 'Sales') as "Sales"
FROM
employees
GROUP BY
role;
role │ R&D │ Sales
───────────┼─────┼───────
Manager │ 1 │ 1
Developer │ 2 │ 2
On Tinybird, you could do the same this way:
SELECT
role,
countIf(department = 'R&D') as "R&D",
countIf(department = 'R&D') as "Sales"
FROM
employees
GROUP BY
role
Running and Cumulative Aggregations
Aggregations over sliding windows are a common solution. This can be done with Window functions.
This also can be done with the groupArrayMovingSum and groupArrayMovingAvg functions, available in stable releases since a long time ago already. This is an example of its usage:
Given this dataset:
SELECT date, amazon as value FROM amazon_trends
You can compute a 7-day moving average of value like this:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT
groupArray(date) as date_arr,
groupArray(value) as value_arr,
groupArrayMovingAvg(7)(value) mov_avg
FROM (SELECT date, amazon as value FROM amazon_trends))
ARRAY JOIN *
The periods parameter is optional. If you omit it, all the previous rows are used for the aggregation.
Linear regression
Given this data
SELECT
arrayJoin([[1.2, 1], [2, 1.8], [3.1, 2.9]])[1] x,
arrayJoin([[1.2, 1], [2, 1.8], [3.1, 2.9]])[2] y
On Postgres you can see in the original post that you'd do linear regression like this:
WITH t AS (SELECT * FROM (VALUES
(1.2, 1.0),
(2.0, 1.8),
(3.1, 2.9)
) AS t(x, y))
SELECT
regr_slope(y, x) AS slope,
regr_intercept(y, x) AS intercept,
sqrt(regr_r2(y, x)) AS r
FROM
t;
slope │ intercept │ r
────────────────────┼──────────────────────┼───
1.0000000000000002 │ -0.20000000000000048 │ 1
There's not a function on Tinybird like regr_r2 that gives you the R2 coefficient, but it wouldn't be hard to calculate it yourself as the formula is simple.
Filling null values
This part is called "interpolation" in Haki's post. Filling null values with Pandas is a one-liner. Consider this table
SELECT * FROM num_str
Fill null values with a constant value
The way to replace all the null values by a constant value is using the coalesce function, that works in Tinybird the same way it does in Postgres, using coalesce:
SELECT
n,
coalesce(v, 'X') AS v
FROM
num_str
Back and forward filling data
groupArray, as the other aggregate functions on Tinybird, skips null values. So the solution involves replacing them by another value (make sure that the new value doesn't appear in the column before). This is done with the ifNull function. Add some array magic in, and this is how you'd do it:
SELECT
values.1 n,
values.2 v,
values.3 v_ffill,
values.4 v_bfill
FROM
(SELECT
arrayJoin(
arrayZip(
groupArray(n) AS n,
arrayMap(x -> x != 'wadus' ? x : null, groupArray(v_nulls_replaced)) AS v,
arrayFill(x -> x != 'wadus', groupArray(v_nulls_replaced)) AS v_ffill,
arrayReverseFill(x -> x != 'wadus', groupArray(v_nulls_replaced)) AS v_bfill
)
) values
FROM
(SELECT
*,
ifNull(v, 'wadus') v_nulls_replaced
FROM num_str
ORDER BY n ASC)
)
To understand what's going on here, import this Pipe with a step-by-step explanation and the results of the transformations that are taking place. Tinybird lets you run each subquery in a node of a notebook-like UI. This lets you build and debug complex queries in a cleaner way. If you'd like to use it, sign up the Tinybird signup page.
Filling gaps in time-series, reshaping indexes
Sometimes, you'll group a time-series by a Date or DateTime column, and it can happen that the intervals between rows aren't always the same because there were no values found for some dates or datetimes. In Pandas, the solution would be creating a new date_range index and then re-indexing the original Series/DataFrame with that index.
On Tinybird, the same can be accomplished with the WITH FILL modifier. Here's a simple example of it:
SELECT
toDate((number * 2) * 86400) AS d1,
'string_value' as string_col,
toInt32(rand() / exp2(32) * 100) as n
FROM numbers(10)
ORDER BY
d1 WITH FILL STEP 1
The STEP 1 part isn't necessary here as it's the default, but know that you can set a different value than 1.
Linear interpolation
Imagine you have a table like this, containing a time-series with some rows missing. You could fill those missing gaps with the WITH FILL expression previously shown, but that way you'd just get zeroes when there's a missing value, while the actual missing value is probably closer to the previous and the next values than to zero.
SELECT *, bar(value, 0, 100, 20)
FROM trends_with_gaps
ORDER BY date WITH FILL STEP 1
Linear interpolation is the simplest way to fill those missing values. In it, missing values are replaced by the average of the previous and the next known values. On Postgres, Haki's post explains how to do it Haki Benita’s linear interpolation example.
On Tinybird, this can be done with arrays:
SELECT
date,
value,
value_interpolated,
bar(value_interpolated, 0, 100, 20) AS value_interpolated_bar
FROM
(
SELECT
groupArray(date) AS dt_arr,
groupArray(value) AS value_arr,
arrayFill(x -> ((x.1) > 0), arrayZip(value_arr, dt_arr)) AS value_lower,
arrayReverseFill(x -> ((x.1) > 0), arrayZip(value_arr, dt_arr)) AS value_upper,
arrayMap((l, u, v, dt) -> if(v > 0, v, (l.1) + ((((u.1) - (l.1)) / ((u.2) - (l.2))) * (dt - (l.2)))), value_lower, value_upper, value_arr, dt_arr) AS value_interpolated
FROM (
SELECT * FROM trends_with_gaps
ORDER BY date WITH FILL STEP 1
)
)
ARRAY JOIN
dt_arr AS date,
value_interpolated,
value_arr AS value
For a step-by-step explanation of how this works, and to see how you could construct this query iteratively with a notebook-like interface on Tinybird, import this Pipe.
Binning and histograms
The original post talks about custom binning, equal-width and equal-height binning. The way to do custom binning is very similar on Tinybird, which also supports CASE statements. Equal height binning could be achieved with the quantiles function, already described before, in the descriptive statistics section. The most interesting use-case of equal-width binning is creating histograms, which is very easy on Tinybird. It even comes with a histogram function, which receives a number of bins and the data, and returns a list of tuples containing the lower and upper bounds of each bucket, as well as its height:
SELECT histogram(10)(value) AS values FROM trends_with_gaps
Conclusion
While Postgres and Tinybird share many SQL features, Tinybird is specifically optimized for real-time analytics on large datasets. The main differences are:
- CTEs in Tinybird are more limited but can be replaced with Pipes
- Tinybird provides specialized functions for time series analysis
- Array operations use different syntax but achieve similar results
- Statistical functions have different names but similar functionality
To get started with Tinybird, sign up here and try these examples with your own data.
